Gait Analysis
Seyed Mehran Ayati Najafabadi; Alireza Hashemi Oskooi; Seyed Masoud Rafiaei
Volume 15, Issue 1 , May 2021, , Pages 73-85
Abstract
People who suffer from leg length discrepancy (LLD) due to the shortening of one side of the lower extremities change their movement pattern because of using compensatory mechanisms. Methods such as manipulating a compensating insole are used to correct the movement pattern to normal. Therefore, the ...
Read More
People who suffer from leg length discrepancy (LLD) due to the shortening of one side of the lower extremities change their movement pattern because of using compensatory mechanisms. Methods such as manipulating a compensating insole are used to correct the movement pattern to normal. Therefore, the knowledge of movement pattern changes in with and without using of insoles can help to develop rehabilitation methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the kinematics of the lower extremities of people with leg length discrepancy during stair climbing with and without using insoles. Twenty participants including 10 normal and 10 LLD people took part in this study. Their movement on stair was recorded using a 7 camera 3-D motion analysis system. Changes in the angles of the hip, the knee and the ankle joints were calculated by the 7-member Euler model and compared by independent and paired sample t-test at 95% confidence level. The results showed that there was a significant difference between healthy people and people with LLD without using insoles. These people had higher extension of the knee, pelvis and ankle at the initial contact and toe off in sagittal plane and more knee and pelvis range of movement, less adduction of the knee and pelvis at the initial contact in frontal plane, higher internal and external rotation of pelvis at the initial contact and ankle in toe off in horizontal plane (p<0.05). The results also showed that maximum abduction of the pelvis and maximum adduction of the ankle, maximum internal rotation and the value of the angle of the knee and ankle had no significant different between normal and LLD people (p>0.05) when using insoles. Therefore, the use of insoles can correct some parameters of the movement pattern of the lower joints.
Gait Analysis
Maryam Hajizade; Alireza Hashemi Oskouei; Farzan Ghalichi; Farhad Tabatabai Ghomshe; Mohammad Razi; Gisela Solo
Volume 9, Issue 1 , April 2015, , Pages 17-31
Abstract
Patients with ACL deficiency (ACLD) have to use different compensatory mechanisms to maintain their stability during daily activities. The aim of this study is to determine the differences in 3D kinematics and peak ground reaction forces (GRF) between ACL deficient legs and healthy contralateral legs ...
Read More
Patients with ACL deficiency (ACLD) have to use different compensatory mechanisms to maintain their stability during daily activities. The aim of this study is to determine the differences in 3D kinematics and peak ground reaction forces (GRF) between ACL deficient legs and healthy contralateral legs during stair ascent. Eight subjects with unilateral ACL deficiency participated in this study. Healthy contralateral legs were considered as control group for further comparisons to ACL deficient legs. A six camera VICON motion analysis system and 2 portable force plates were used to record the locomotion while walking up custom-made stairs with two different step heights. Advanced OSSCA technique was used to assess tibiofemoral knee kinematics, a combination of symmetrical axis of rotation (SARA), symmetrical center of rotation estimation (SCoRE) and optimal common shape technique (OCST). The results of this study show that participants with ACLD experienced different kinematics and peak GRFs in different step heights (p<0.05). During ascending stairs with 17cm height, legs with ACLD exhibited less varus, more external rotation and less impact peak in pre-swing stance and early swing phase compared to contralateral healthy leg (p<0.05). The other stair height, 20 cm, resulted in more extension, more valgus and more external tibia rotation in injured leg compared to contralateral leg during terminal extension of stance phase (p<0.05). In both step heights, injured leg reached it maximum extension peak at an earlier time. The results of this study imply that participants with ACLD make use of different 3D rotational tiobiofemoral kinematics and different GRF compared to healthy contralateral leg. These compensatory mechanisms would finally bring about different knee joint loading, which provides the potential of cartilage degeneration and early osteoarthritis.
