Document Type : Full Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan

2 Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan

3 Associate Professor, Biological Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory, Biomedical Engineering Faculty, Amirkabir University of Technology

4 Professor, Division of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, Sistan and Baluchestan

10.22041/ijbme.2012.13102

Abstract

Hemodynamic parameters are always affected by stenosis severity of arterial and these parameters in their turn have influence on the development of atherosclerosis. In this paper, By considering three different stenosis severity, the effects of wall porosity assumption on the hemodynamic parameters of a stenosed artery  with a two-layer flexible wall (intima-media, adventitia), in which inner layer (intima-media) assumed porous, is numerically investigated, using Porous Fluid Structure Interaction (PFSI) model. Blood is assumed as an incompressible non-Newtonian fluid with pulsatile flow condition. In this investigation, the results show that the permeability assumption has much influenced on the hemodynamic characteristics so that the comparison of the results using PFSI with those of a non-porous model show 6% decrease in shear stress, 30% increase in displacement and more than 72%  increase in effective stress in the porous layer.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1] Bathe, M., Kamm, R. D., A Fluid-Structure Interaction Finite Element Analysis of Pulsatile Blood Flow Through a Compliant Stenotic Artery; ASME J. of Biomechanical Engineering, 1999; 121: 361–369.
[2] Tang, D., Kobayashi, S., Zheng, J., Effect of Stenosis Asymmetry on Blood Flow and Artery Compression: A Three- Dimensional Fluid Structure Interaction Model; Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2003; 31(10): 1182–1193.
[3] Chen, C. X., Ding, Y., Gear, J. A., Blood flow in stenosed arteries using two way, Fluid-Structure Interaction; ANZIAM J., 2010; 51:C586-C611.
[4] Khanafer, K., Berguer, R., Fluid–structure interaction analysis of turbulent pulsatile flow within a layered aortic wall as related to aortic dissection; J. of Biomechanics, 2009; 42: 2642-2648.
[5] Valencia, A., Baeza, F., Numerical simulation of fluid–structure interaction in stenotic arteries considering two layer nonlinear anisotropic structural model; International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2009; 36:142-137.
[6] Amornsamankul, S., Wiwatanapataphe, B., Hong Wu, Y., Lenbury, Y., Effect of Non-Newtonian Behaviour of Blood on Pulsatile Flows in Stenotic Arteries; Int. J. Biomedical Sciences,  2001;1.
[7] Yang, N., Vafai, K., Modeling of low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) transport in The artery-effects of hypertension; Int. J. of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2006;49: 850–867.
[8] Chung, S, Vafai, K., Low-density lipoprotein transport within a multi-layered arterial wall:  Effect of the atherosclerotic plaque / stenosis; J. Biomech., 2013; 46: 574–585.
[9] Ayyalasomayajula, J. P., Geest, V., Simon, B. R., Porohyperelastic Finite Element Modeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms; J. of Biomechanical Engineering, 2010; 132: 104502–8.
[10] Chung, S, Vafai, K., Effect of the fluid–structure interactions on low-density lipoprotein transport with in a Multi-layered arterial wall; J. Biomech., 2012; 45: 371-81.
[11] ADINA R & D, Inc., Theory and modeling guide, 2008