Document Type : Full Research Paper


1 Ph.D. Student, Biomedical Engineering Department, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

2 Professor, Biomedical Engineering Department, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Biomedical Engineering Department, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Biomedical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran



Considering the common diseases that occur in the heart valves, it is possible that these valves can be replaced with artificial valves. This article examines different types of polymeric valves for the possibility of replacement in the human body. Different models are compared and the optimal valve is presented. For complete information, refer to the text of the article.


Main Subjects

  1. N. Ghista, “Toward an optimum prosthetic trileaflet aortic-valve design,” Med. Biol. Eng., vol. 14, no. 2, Mar. 1976, doi: 10.1007/BF02478737.
  2. Généreux et al., “Transcatheter aortic valve implantation 10-year anniversary: review of current evidence and clinical implications,” Eur. Heart J., vol. 33, no. 19, pp. 2388–2398, 2012.
  3. L. Li et al., “Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing,” Biomaterials, vol. 225. Elsevier Ltd, p. 119493, Dec. 01, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119493.
  4. B. Roe and D. Moore, “Design and fabrication of prosthetic valves,” Exp. Med. Surg., vol. 16, no. 2–3, pp. 177–182, 1958.
  5. N. Ghista and H. Reul, “Optimal prosthetic aortic leaflet valve: Design parametric and longevity analyses: Development of the avcothane-51 leaflet valve based on the optimum design analysis,” J. Biomech., vol. 10, no. 5–6, pp. 313–324, Jan. 1977, doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(77)90004-5.
  6. B. Wisman, W. S. Pierce, J. H. Donachy, W. E. Pae, J. L. Myers, and G. A. Prophet, “A polyurethane trileaflet cardiac valve prosthesis: In vitro and in vivo studies,” Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 164–168, 1982, Accessed: Feb. 06, 2021. [Online]. Available:
  7. E. Leat and J. Fisher, “A synthetic leaflet heart valve with improved opening characteristics,” Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 470–476, Nov. 1994, doi: 10.1016/1350-4533(94)90071-X.
  8. G. Mackay, D. J. Wheatley, G. M. Bernacca, A. C. Fisher, and C. S. Hindle, “New polyurethane heart valve prosthesis: Design, manufacture and evaluation,” Biomaterials, vol. 17, no. 19, pp. 1857–1863, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(95)00242-1.
  9. R. Labrosse, K. Lobo, and C. J. Beller, “Structural analysis of the natural aortic valve in dynamics: From unpressurized to physiologically loaded,” J.Biomech.,vol.43, no. 10,Jul.2010, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.020.
  10. H. Gharaie and Y. Morsi, “A Novel Design of a Polymeric Aortic Valve,” Int. J. Artif. Organs, vol. 38, no. 5, May 2015, doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000413.
  11. Dabiri, J. Ronsky, I. Ali, A. Basha, A. Bhanji, and K. Narine, “Effects of leaflet design on transvalvular gradients of bioprosthetic heart valves,” Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 363–373, 2016.
  12. Mohammadi, D. Goode, G. Fradet, and K. Mequanint, “Proposed percutaneous aortic valve prosthesis made of cryogel,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med., vol. 233, no. 5, May 2019, doi: 10.1177/0954411919837302.
  13. Pfensig et al., “Assessment of heart valve performance by finite-element design studies of polymeric leaflet-structures,” Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 631–634, 2017.
  14. Utku Gulbulak, A. Ertas, T. B. Baturalp, and T. Pavelka, “The effect of fundamental curves on geometric orifice and coaptation areas of polymeric heart valves,” J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., vol. 112, p. 104039, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104039.
  15. De Kerchove et al., “Free margin length and coaptation surface area in normal tricuspid aortic valve: An anatomical study,” Eur. J. Cardio-thoracic Surg., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1040–1048, May 2018, doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx456.
  16. Li and W. Sun, “Simulated transcatheter aortic valve deformation: A parametric study on the impact of leaflet geometry on valve peak stress,” Int. j. numer. method. biomed. eng., vol. 33, no. 3, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1002/cnm.2814.
  17. Serrani et al., “A Computational Tool for the Microstructure Optimization of a Polymeric Heart Valve Prosthesis,” J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 138, no. 6, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1115/1.4033178.
  18. Brubert, S. Krajewski, H. P. Wendel, S. Nair, J. Stasiak, and G. D. Moggridge, “Hemocompatibility of styrenic block copolymers for use in prosthetic heart valves,” J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., vol. 27, no. 2, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10856-015-5628-7.
  19. Thubrikar, L. P. Bosher, and S. P. Nolan, “The mechanism of opening of the aortic valve,” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 863–870, 1979.
  20. Thubrikar, W. C. Piepgrass, T. W. Shaner, and S. P. Nolan, “The design of the normal aortic valve,” Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol., vol. 241, no. 6, pp. H795–H801, 1981.
  21. Luraghi, F. Migliavacca, and J. F. Rodriguez Matas, “Study on the Accuracy of Structural and FSI Heart Valves Simulations,” Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 723–738, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s13239-018-00373-3.
  22. E. Hall and M. E. Hall, Guyton and Hall textbook of medical physiology e-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2020.
  23. Li and W. Sun, “Simulated Thin Pericardial Bioprosthetic Valve Leaflet Deformation Under Static Pressure-Only Loading Conditions: Implications for Percutaneous Valves,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 8, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0009-3.
  24. J. Thubrikar, J. D. Deck, J. Aouad, and S. P. Nolan, “Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves,” J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 115–125, 1983.
  25. M. Bernacca, T. G. Mackay, R. Wilkinson, and D. J. Wheatley, “Calcification and fatigue failure in a polyurethane heart valve,” Biomaterials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 279–285, 1995.
  26. Brubert, “A novel polymeric prosthetic heart valve: design, manufacture, and testing,” University of Cambridge, 2016.
  27. Borowski et al., “Fluid-structure interaction of heart valve dynamics in comparison to finite-element analysis,” Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 259–262, 2018.