Iranian Journal of Biomedical Engineering (IJBME)
نشریه علمی مهندسی پزشکی زیستی

Non-Invasive Deep Electrical Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex of the Rat by Temporal Interference Method

Document Type : Full Research Paper

Authors

Zohre Mojiri 1
Amir Akhavan 2
Ehsan Rouhani 2

1 M.Sc. Student, Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Biomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22041/ijbme.2022.562481.1804
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a technique to stimulate the deep areas of the brain which can be used in both invasive and non-invasive methods. In invasive DBS, the electrodes are surgically implanted inside the brain to achieve the desired depth of the stimulation. The invasive DBS approach suffers from intracranial bleeding. One solution is using non-invasive DBS by temporal interference (TI) method. In TI stimulation, the constructive interference of two electric fields generated by two high-frequency sinusoidal currents increases the stimulation intensity at a certain depth. The objective of this paper is to investigate quantitatively as well as qualitative analysis of TI stimulation effect on the activation of primary motor cortex area of the rat. To this end, a 4-channel stimulator is used. The experiment is conducted on one anesthetized rat. The transcranial stimulation is applied by the electrode fixed on the skull with screw and the results are evaluated qualitatively and the quantitatively in the domains of time, frequency, and space. To quantify the results, a three-axis accelerometer sensor is used to record the movement acceleration of the right hand. The results showed that, the variation of the stimulation parameters (stimulation current intensity, frequency difference and ratio of currents of the two electrodes) changed the stimulation area inside the two hemispheres of the brain and movement range of the right hand. Moreover, the relationship between the difference frequency of the stimulation of the two pairs of electrodes and the range of motion was analyzed using a three-order polynomial regression model.

Keywords

Deep Brain Stimulation
Temporal Interference
Non-Invasive
Rat Primary Motor Cortex

Subjects

  1. H. Moffa et al., "Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for major depressive disorder: an individual patient data meta-analysis," Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 99, p. 109836, 2020.
  2. Luo et al., "Deep brain stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: stimulation parameters and potential mechanisms of action," Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 619543, 2021.
  3. Lin, C. Zhang, D. Li, and B. Sun, "Lateralized effects of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: evidence and controversies," npj Parkinson's Disease, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2021.
  4. Kallupi et al., "Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates cocaine withdrawal but increases cocaine self-administration, cocaine-induced locomotor activity, and GluR1/GluA1 in the central nucleus of the amygdala in male cocaine-dependent rats," Brain Stimulation, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 13-22, 2022.
  5. Reed and R. Cohen Kadosh, "Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) mechanisms and its effects on cortical excitability and connectivity," Journal of inherited metabolic disease, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1123-1130, 2018.
  6. K. Krauss et al., "Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions," Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 75-87, 2021.
  7. Grossman et al., "Noninvasive deep brain stimulation via temporally interfering electric fields," cell, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 1029-1041. e16, 2017.
  8. S. Santos et al., "Bimodal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces alcohol consumption and induces long-term neurochemical changes in rats with neuropathic pain," Neuroscience Letters, vol. 759, p. 136014, 2021.
  9. G. Regner et al., "Preclinical to clinical translation of studies of transcranial direct-current stimulation in the treatment of epilepsy: a systematic review," Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 12, p. 189, 2018.
  10. Wang, S. Xiao, C. Yu, J. Zhou, and W. Fu, "Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with physical training on the excitability of the motor cortex, physical performance, and motor learning: a systematic review," Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 648354, 2021.
  11. Pol, M. A. Salehinejad, H. Baharlouei, and M. A. Nitsche, "The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review," Translational neurodegeneration, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2021.
  12. Khodashenas, G. Baghdadi, and F. Towhidkhah, "A modified Hodgkin–Huxley model to show the effect of motor cortex stimulation on the trigeminal neuralgia network," The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-23, 2019.
  13. M. Moeini, S. S. Sadr, and E. Riahi, "Deep Brain Stimulation of the Lateral Hypothalamus Facilitates Extinction and Prevents Reinstatement of Morphine Place Preference in Rats," Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 240-247, 2021.
  14. R. Sullivan, S. Olsen, and A. S. Widge, "Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders: From focal brain targets to cognitive networks," Neuroimage, vol. 225, p. 117515, 2021.
  15. A. Johnson, J. Wang, S. D. Nebeck, J. Zhang, M. D. Johnson, and J. L. Vitek, "Direct activation of primary motor cortex during subthalamic but not pallidal deep brain stimulation," Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2166-2177, 2020.
  16. L. Lachenmayer et al., "Subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease—meta-analysis of outcomes," NPJ Parkinson's disease, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2021.
  17. Nahvi and F. Bahrami, "Which one is more effective in Parkinson's disease? Stimulating the motor cortex or the basal ganglia?," in 2010 17th Iranian Conference of Biomedical Engineering (ICBME), 2010: IEEE, pp. 1-4.
  18. Grossman, M. S. Okun, and E. S. Boyden, "Translating temporal interference brain stimulation to treat neurological and psychiatric conditions," JAMA neurology, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 1307-1308, 2018.
  19. Gomez-Tames, A. Asai, and A. Hirata, "Multiscale computational model reveals nerve response in a mouse model for temporal interference brain stimulation," Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 684465, 2021.
  20. Missey et al., "Orientation of temporal interference for non-invasive deep brain stimulation in epilepsy," Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 656, 2021.
  21. Ma et al., "High Gamma and Beta Temporal Interference Stimulation in the Human Motor Cortex Improves Motor Functions," Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 15, 2021.
Iranian Journal of Biomedical Engineering (IJBME)
Volume 16, Issue 3
Autumn 2022
Pages 245-256

  • Receive Date 21 September 2022
  • Revise Date 07 November 2022
  • Accept Date 12 November 2022

Home

Contact Us